levelt's model of speech production explained

(1999). Dells model explains the results of a study by Dell and Oppenheim (2007),[16] who exposed subjects to lists of primer phrases, induced phoneme exchanges, and recorded the nature of the output phrases. Macroplanning is thought to be the elaboration of a communication goal into subgoals and connecting them with the relevant information. Comprehensibility: This is the ability to be understood by others, it is related with the sound of the language. WebA theory of lexical access in speech production Preparing words in speech production is normally a fast and accurate process. The process by which people translate thoughts into verbal words. The form of a word as it is presented at the head of an entry in a dictionary. 845-866).Cambridge: MIT Press. This suggests that these segments must be operating within some frame such as syllable structure. Despite vast amounts of research, so far there is no single, all-inclusive model of speech production. In other words, lexical cohesion refers to relationships in meaning between lexical items in a text. [21][22], A more recent (than Fromkin's) attempt to explain speech production was published by Garrett in 1975. substituting yell> when the target was shout) occur at the Lexical Selection stage, where as speech errors involving syntactic function (i.e. Content may be subject to copyright. 4: Levelt's model of speech production. From (Levelt, 1989, reprinted courtesy of The MIT Press) This dissertation approaches the task of modeling human sentence production from a connectionist point of view, and using distributed semantic representations. The model represents levels for morphemes, segments, and phonetic representations. Once you start the video, focus on the cross in the middle of the screen. We generate them two or three per second in fluent conversation; and overtly naming a clear picture of an object can easily be initiated within 600 msec after picture onset. To help explain grammar encoding, Tree-Adjoining Grammar (TAG), shows that the objects of the grammar are small trees, which include a word or lexical head. These include the elements from which speech is composed, listed below. ;(z:=4^v+ekpT#YI) eVO|VVC>L?Zu#?Gi:Cx,4hyD}5L)&52j,FC Dwo Jna +Dc |`9+ixb6G8edo(#w^@f^Q7j5,mFwGphI%njdgWbf)0Tl!n:+8\1dxUx|s>[|)o r| endstream endobj 90 0 obj 1205 endobj 91 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 705 /CapHeight 635 /Descent -249 /Flags 34 /FontBBox [ -117 -250 1172 844 ] /FontName /AILBGH+Berkeley-Black /ItalicAngle 0 /StemV 145 /XHeight 426 /CharSet (/e/space/i/t/J/v/m/L/W/l/M/period) /FontFile3 122 0 R >> endobj 92 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F16 /FirstChar 9 /LastChar 255 /Widths [ 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 296 444 556 556 907 907 222 389 389 500 556 278 333 278 278 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 278 278 556 556 556 426 800 648 630 685 741 593 574 741 741 370 370 685 574 852 741 759 593 759 648 556 630 722 648 981 630 574 574 389 278 389 556 500 333 524 556 460 574 455 333 477 574 301 301 574 301 838 574 537 574 556 407 441 352 574 481 759 519 500 463 389 222 389 556 278 648 648 685 593 741 759 722 524 524 524 524 524 524 460 455 455 455 455 301 301 301 301 574 537 537 537 537 537 574 574 574 574 500 375 556 556 500 500 600 648 800 800 1000 333 333 0 907 759 0 556 0 0 556 574 0 0 0 0 0 350 350 0 724 531 426 296 556 0 556 0 0 519 519 1000 278 648 648 759 1000 778 500 1000 444 444 222 222 556 0 500 574 167 0 333 333 630 630 500 278 222 444 1167 648 593 648 593 593 370 370 370 370 759 759 0 759 722 722 722 301 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 ] /Encoding 85 0 R /BaseFont /AILBGH+Berkeley-Black /FontDescriptor 91 0 R >> endobj 93 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 750 /CapHeight 698 /Descent -210 /Flags 262176 /FontBBox [ -164 -250 1000 954 ] /FontName /AILAKN+Frutiger-Black /ItalicAngle 0 /StemV 180 /XHeight 521 /CharSet (/T/zero/e/q/colon/D/parenleft/one/A/space/f/r/a/semicolon/E/parenright/t\ wo/h/s/R/g/F/three/i/t/four/j/u/I/d/five/k/comma/v/V/six/m/w/W/hyphen/l/\ seven/n/M/y/period/x/H/b/o/B/eight/slash/c/p/quoteright/C/O/nine) /FontFile3 121 0 R >> endobj 94 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F14 /FirstChar 9 /LastChar 255 /Widths [ 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 444 611 612 612 1000 778 333 389 389 611 600 306 333 306 278 612 612 612 612 612 612 612 612 612 612 306 306 600 600 600 556 800 778 667 667 778 611 556 778 722 334 444 722 556 1000 778 778 611 778 667 611 556 722 722 1000 722 722 611 389 278 389 600 500 333 611 668 500 668 611 444 668 667 334 334 611 334 1000 667 668 668 668 444 500 444 667 611 944 611 611 500 389 222 389 600 306 778 778 667 611 778 778 722 611 611 611 611 611 611 500 611 611 611 611 334 334 334 334 667 668 668 668 668 668 667 667 667 667 611 400 612 612 611 500 620 667 800 800 1000 333 333 0 1000 778 0 600 0 0 612 667 0 0 0 0 0 397 434 0 944 668 556 444 600 0 612 0 0 611 611 1000 306 778 778 778 1000 1000 500 1000 611 611 333 333 600 0 611 722 167 0 333 333 778 778 611 306 333 611 1000 778 611 778 611 611 334 334 334 334 778 778 0 778 722 722 722 334 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 ] /Encoding 85 0 R /BaseFont /AILAKN+Frutiger-Black /FontDescriptor 93 0 R >> endobj 95 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 750 /CapHeight 698 /Descent -210 /Flags 262176 /FontBBox [ -166 -250 1000 935 ] /FontName /AIKPJA+Frutiger-Bold /ItalicAngle 0 /StemV 140 /XHeight 515 /CharSet (/zero/e/one/space/r/two/s/R/g/three/i/t/S/four/u/d/five/v/six/m/w/seven/\ n/H/eight/o/c/nine) /FontFile3 120 0 R >> endobj 96 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F12 /FirstChar 9 /LastChar 255 /Widths [ 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 389 481 556 556 1000 722 278 333 333 556 600 278 333 278 389 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 278 278 600 600 600 500 800 722 611 611 722 556 500 722 722 278 389 667 500 944 722 778 556 778 611 556 556 722 667 1000 667 667 556 333 389 333 600 500 278 556 611 444 611 556 389 611 611 278 278 556 278 889 611 611 611 611 389 444 389 611 556 889 556 556 500 333 222 333 600 278 722 722 611 556 722 778 722 556 556 556 556 556 556 444 556 556 556 556 278 278 278 278 611 611 611 611 611 611 611 611 611 611 556 400 556 556 556 500 620 611 800 800 1000 278 278 0 944 778 0 600 0 0 556 611 0 0 0 0 0 361 397 0 889 611 500 389 600 0 556 0 0 556 556 1000 278 722 722 778 944 944 500 1000 481 481 278 278 600 0 556 667 167 0 333 333 667 667 556 278 278 481 1000 722 556 722 556 556 278 278 278 278 778 778 0 778 722 722 722 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 ] /Encoding 85 0 R /BaseFont /AIKPJA+Frutiger-Bold /FontDescriptor 95 0 R >> endobj 97 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 90 0 R >> stream For example, substitution errors of words within the same semantic ballpark (i.e. It includes the use of sociolinguistic knowledge the skills required to communicate effectively across cultures; the norms, the knowledge of what is appropriate to say in what situations and to whom. As a result, the speaker may have activated the concept nodes that are semantically related to the target word boots, such as the node representing feet. The retrieval of the appropriate lemmas from the mental lexicon engages the parsed speech self-perception rhetorical/semantic/syntactic system conceptual preparation , phonological/phonetic system overt speech model of addressee (ToM). Learn how BCcampus supports open education and how you can access Pressbooks. Continue reading here: Integrative Reasoning, Tantracure Cure Premature Ejaculation In 7 Steps, Confluence Approaches to the Study of Creativity. %%EOF (1975). For Students: How to Access and Use this Textbook, 1.3 Research Methods in Psycholinguistics, 9.2 The Standard Model of Speech Production. For example, in English, there are two realizations of unvoiced stops. They propose that the initial process of conceptual preparation occurs in range of heteromodal and cortical association areas (specific to the modality of contextual information preceding the present production process), the activity of which converges with the selection of a lexical concept occurring in the left middle temporal gyrus. 0000003858 00000 n Johnstone (1990, p.33) even believed that evaluation is a dimension of all choices storytellers make about how to encode events. >r2;zVN>#j7?yQ#C8? Cognition, 64, 309-343. As researchers collected greater volumes of speech error data, they began to investigate the psychological processes responsible for the production of speech sounds and to contemplate possible processes for fluent speech. How do the parallel and serial models of speech production explain the lexical bias effect differently? Jay. In conceptualization , we determine what to say. %PDF-1.4 % Though the speech errors that we do produce provide valuable information about the process, they are relatively rare and difficult to induce experimentally. [15].Figure 3. adapted from Dell and O'Seqghdha (1994)[15], When a word is selected, all of the nodes representing that word's constituent morphemes, phonemes, semantics and syntax are activated and this activation spreads to the adjacent nodes until one node, the node that is most highly activated is selected for the output string. Webmodels of lexical access in production represent some of the earliest applications of connectionist ideas to psycholinguistic data (e.g., Dell & Reich, 1977; Harley, 1984; [27] The lowest and final level is the form stratum which, similarly to the Dell Model, contains syllabic information. Different sounds are produced in different areas, and with different muscles and breathing techniques. Speech Perception in a Model of Production The theory of production proposed in Levelt (1989) and the further mod eling of its lexical access component in Levelt, Roelofs, and Meyer (1999) postulate three types of relation between the productive and receptive mechanisms of the language user. Thirdly, it seems that all models agree that you would need to access semantics and syntax prior to the phonology of an utterance, as the former dictate the latter and thus, all models share in common the following stages and substages in this order: New York: Harcourt Brace Javanovich. (1997). This property necessitates a model whose output can interact with the initial message and demands parallel processing of speech production. During this stage, infants must select and match stored representations of words to the specific perceptual target word in order to convey meaning or concepts. Garrett justified the two separate stages by, once again, consulting speech errors. Webdiscussion of planning for connected speech in Levelt's 1989 book (L89); in chapter 10 of that volume we find a description of how higher-level prosodic structure can be built from PWd elements. I-com-pre-hend vs. Figure 21.1. 0000007770 00000 n *Fig. Hinojosa, J.A., Mendez-Bertolo, C., Carretle, L., and Pozo, M.A. Evidence from speech error data supports the following conclusions about speech production. 223 0 obj<>stream Lemma level: select the lemma of the word tiger. The lexical bias effect is modulated by context, but the standard monitoring account doesnt fly: Related beply to Baars et al. This retrieval of lemmas from the mental lexicon, which also entails retrieval of each lemma's inherent morpho-phono-logical code, serves as a transition out of the "rhetorical/semantic/syntactic system" and into the "phonological/phonetic system." We produce this speech without thought. Developmental Psychology Childhood and Adolescence. Garrett, M.F. Neuropsychologia. 181 0 obj<> endobj WebSpeech production falls into three broad areas: conceptualization, formulation and articulation (Levelt, 1989). WebLevelt, W.J.M., 1992. [7] The infants vocabulary growth increases substantially when they are able to understand that objects exist even when they are not present. Exercises to Lose Weight From Your Stomach, Latest Treatment of Anxiety and Panic Attacks, How To Treat Erectile Dysfunction Naturally. Levelt, W. (1999). At the fourth stage of this model, words are selected starting with content words. 0000002728 00000 n Information and communication are dialectically linked, The accommodation theory has as its main subject speakers and the reason why these naturally converge (changing of speech) towards the people that are listening. 0000007530 00000 n 'N`z. Do not be dismayed if you did not find this result, remember this is simply a pseudo-experiment. This paper introduces a special issue of Cognition on Continue reading here: Studies of Information Processing Deficits Related to Formal Thought Disorder, Fluxactive Complete Prostate Wellness Formula, Beat Procrastination for Once and For All, Studies of Information Processing Deficits Related to Formal Thought Disorder, Differences Between Scientific Reasoning and Legal Reasoning, The Roles of Analogy in Scientific Thinking. Webchapter. New York: Harcourt Brace Javanovich. 0000023780 00000 n In an analogy to computer It might be helpful to say them out loud to yourself to see how intonation or pronunciation are affected by the error/phenomena in each example. (1973). In this case, the content words were exchanged, and the feature words A and An followed the phonological rules of their content words regardless of the switch; that is, the feature word does not move with its misplaced stem. 0000004859 00000 n This model consists of four levels of processing,[10] the first of which is the Message level, where the main idea to be conveyed is generated (Fig. 0000002715 00000 n Function words and affixes added Levelt further refined the lexical network proposed by Dell. b)Using the semantic network below, come up with plausible examples of the following kinds of speech errors/phenomena following the principles of a connectionist model of speech production: Dell G.S. trailer These test blocks were presented as either homogeneous or heterogenous phonological forms. startxref The fact that the morpheme a was replaced with an to correctly follow the phonological rules associated with words beginning with vowels can be taken as evidence that morpheme selection occurs after the word and phrase structure have already been selected. These stages have been described in two types of processing models: the lexical access models and the serial models. 0000014174 00000 n 3). Inhibition in interactive activation models of linguistic selection and sequencing. This system also sequences ideas in a logical order and places that sequence in a propositional format (specific to linguistic expression) that includes the selection of lexical concepts, in turn triggering the retrieval of appropriate lemmas from the mental lexicon (for a discussion of computational evidence for the model's lexical selection mechanism, see Levelt, Roelofs, & Meyer, 1999; also see Medin & Rips, Chap. Fig. As shown in Figure 21.1, Levelt's model involves a serial process by which a message intended for communication moves through a succession of stages, each of In the homogenous blocks there were shared onsets or the segments differed only in voicing. (2007). Put a tick in the appropriate column of your tally sheet. %PDF-1.2 % Speech is a psychomotor activity. Until the first year of life infants cannot produce coherent words, instead they produce a reoccurring babbling sound. Nelson. Putting these basic elements together, Meyer (2000) introduced the Standard Model of Word-form Encoding (see Figure 9.2) as a summation of previously proposed speech production models (Dell, 1986; Levelt et al., 1999; Shattuck-Huffnagel, 1979, 1983; Fromkin, 1971, 1973; Garrett, 1975, 1980). B&6!E*3Y*yLtj\YG.LQPp0rjWMPz"4Jv;]X]O*t."*V>2]wEXMDW"6 8,b,3\CZF+`XNTaH9r("l2Y%$`hh1 ^c*B7B {#M+H81g(/ Kha# xBen3U Q``hq``u \DT:J68p=TH< phonemes, morphemes, syllables, concepts, etc.) Innovation Insider Newsletter. At the third level of the model, the Positional level, the order and inflection of each morphological slot is determined. Finally, both models fail to account for cognitive intrusions like those seen in Freudian slips (Example 3 below). Modality and Mood are often used to express the interpersonal function. 0000006264 00000 n Syntactic process in sentence production In G. Bower (Ed.). A Spreading activation theory of retrieval and sentence production. Interface Hypothesis also considers gestures stem form visual-spatial images in working memory. What do the following examples of speech errors/phenomena tell us about the process of speech production? Gazzagina(Ed. [1] Errors in speech production are relatively rare occurring at a rate of about once in every 900 words in spontaneous speech. 1) The intended meaning is generated WebLevelt (1989) estimated the production lexicon of normal educated adults at about 30 000 words, but this can easily be out by a factor two. Not only would speech production involving controlled selection, retrieval, and in tegration of semantic information be likely to activate the network previously described (Indefrey & Levelt, 1999), but it would also likely activate a relatively more anterior region of left inferior prefrontal cortex (Gold & Buckner, 2002; Kounios et al., 2003) that appears to facilitate controlled selection of information stored in long-term memory by resolving interference from activated, nontarget pieces of information (ThompsonSchill et al., 2002). 409-451). Proust and the squid:The story and science of the reading brain, New York, NY. 0000016589 00000 n (2011), Psycholinguistics. Since nodes within the same level or representation are competing for activation, the wrong node is often activated. The Fromkin Model is limited in that is strictly top-down and does not involve any kind of feedback system, which means that it does not account for the phonological bias or lexical bias, the tendency for phonological speech errors to result in real words more often than in non-words [7]. After two and a half years the infant develops systems of lemmas used in speech production. 0000023333 00000 n Although The Utterance Generator Model accounts for many nuances and data found by speech error studies, researchers decided it still had room to be improved. Psychology and language: n introduction to psycholingsuitics. Dell, G.S., Change, F., and Griffin, Z.M. Levelt's model of normal speech production. Make sure to let the video completely load before pressing play. WebIn this model, speech errors are accounted for by the malfunctioning of one of these processing levels in three possible ways: by the faulty access- ing of items for a particular slot at that level (e.g., word substitutions), by the blending of alternative choices for a particular slot at that level (e.g., word blends), or by the misordering of WebPsycholinguistics : What is speech production? [20] The fifth stage applies rules of pronunciation and produces syllables that are to be outputted. [16] The Dell model justifies these findings on the basis of semantic priming. Stages defined by speech errors suggest two polar views: on one end, the view that speech is produced serially, and on the other end the view that the process consists of many, interacting nodes that process levels of representation in parallel. Language production. I|X#X:h5Lz#KB[5 Hs84Xmpf:H & } endstream endobj 129 0 obj 545 endobj 79 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 74 0 R /Resources 80 0 R /Contents [ 89 0 R 97 0 R 99 0 R 101 0 R 103 0 R 107 0 R 109 0 R 125 0 R ] /CropBox [ 130 188 733 1048 ] /Thumb 51 0 R /MediaBox [ 0 0 858 1236 ] /Rotate 0 >> endobj 80 0 obj << /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB ] /Font << /F6 81 0 R /F8 83 0 R /F10 88 0 R /F12 96 0 R /F14 94 0 R /F16 92 0 R /F18 105 0 R >> /XObject << /Im1 126 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 127 0 R /GS2 118 0 R /GS3 114 0 R >> >> endobj 81 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F6 /FirstChar 9 /LastChar 255 /Widths [ 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 280 438 510 510 868 834 248 320 320 420 510 255 320 255 347 510 510 510 510 510 510 510 510 510 510 255 255 510 510 510 330 781 627 627 694 784 580 533 743 812 354 354 684 560 921 780 792 588 792 656 504 682 744 650 968 648 590 638 320 329 320 510 500 380 420 510 400 513 409 301 464 522 268 259 484 258 798 533 492 516 503 349 346 321 520 434 684 439 448 390 320 255 320 510 255 627 627 694 580 780 792 744 420 420 420 420 420 420 402 409 409 409 409 268 268 268 268 533 492 492 492 492 492 520 520 520 520 486 400 510 510 506 398 520 555 800 800 1044 360 380 0 846 792 0 510 0 0 510 522 0 0 0 0 0 354 387 0 615 496 330 280 510 0 510 0 0 421 421 1000 255 627 627 792 1016 730 500 1000 438 438 248 248 510 0 448 590 100 0 256 256 539 539 486 255 248 438 1174 627 580 627 580 580 354 354 354 354 792 792 0 792 744 744 744 268 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 ] /Encoding 85 0 R /BaseFont /AIKLCN+AGaramond-Semibold /FontDescriptor 82 0 R >> endobj 82 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 720 /CapHeight 663 /Descent -270 /Flags 262178 /FontBBox [ -177 -269 1123 866 ] /FontName /AIKLCN+AGaramond-Semibold /ItalicAngle 0 /StemV 105 /XHeight 397 /CharSet (/T/e/colon/P/one/space/f/r/a/two/h/s/g/three/i/t/four/plus/u/d/five/k/m/\ w/hyphen/L/l/n/x/at/period/M/H/o/c/p/C) /FontFile 113 0 R >> endobj 83 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F8 /FirstChar 9 /LastChar 255 /Widths [ 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 220 404 500 500 844 818 235 320 320 394 500 250 320 250 327 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 250 250 500 500 500 321 765 623 605 696 780 584 538 747 806 338 345 675 553 912 783 795 549 795 645 489 660 746 676 960 643 574 641 320 309 320 500 500 360 404 500 400 509 396 290 446 515 257 253 482 247 787 525 486 507 497 332 323 307 512 432 660 432 438 377 320 239 320 500 250 623 623 696 584 783 795 746 404 404 404 404 404 404 401 396 396 396 396 257 257 257 257 525 486 486 486 486 486 512 512 512 512 480 348 500 500 506 388 500 523 790 790 1100 360 360 0 850 795 0 500 0 0 500 512 0 0 0 0 0 332 387 0 585 486 321 220 500 0 500 0 0 378 378 1000 250 623 623 795 1012 729 500 1000 404 404 235 235 500 0 438 574 100 0 233 233 522 522 480 250 215 384 1144 623 584 623 584 584 338 338 338 338 795 795 0 795 746 746 746 257 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 ] /Encoding 85 0 R /BaseFont /AIKMEL+AGaramond-Regular /FontDescriptor 84 0 R >> endobj 84 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 720 /CapHeight 663 /Descent -270 /Flags 34 /FontBBox [ -183 -269 1099 851 ] /FontName /AIKMEL+AGaramond-Regular /ItalicAngle 0 /StemV 74 /XHeight 397 /CharSet (/T/zero/e/q/colon/P/parenleft/one/A/space/r/f/a/E/semicolon/endash/two/h\ /s/g/parenright/R/bracketleft/three/bracketright/i/t/G/F/exclam/S/K/four\ /D/u/I/U/j/d/udieresis/five/k/v/comma/V/ae/question/m/w/hyphen/W/six/quo\ teleft/l/seven/n/y/x/period/M/L/H/b/o/B/z/eight/slash/N/Y/c/p/nine/quote\ right/O/C) /FontFile 111 0 R >> endobj 85 0 obj << /Type /Encoding /Differences [ 9 /space 39 /quotesingle 96 /grave 128 /Adieresis /Aring /Ccedilla /Eacute /Ntilde /Odieresis /Udieresis /aacute /agrave /acircumflex /adieresis /atilde /aring /ccedilla /eacute /egrave /ecircumflex /edieresis /iacute /igrave /icircumflex /idieresis /ntilde /oacute /ograve /ocircumflex /odieresis /otilde /uacute /ugrave /ucircumflex /udieresis /dagger /degree 164 /section /bullet /paragraph /germandbls /registered /copyright /trademark /acute /dieresis /notequal /AE /Oslash /infinity /plusminus /lessequal /greaterequal /yen /mu /partialdiff /summation /product /pi /integral /ordfeminine /ordmasculine /Omega /ae /oslash /questiondown /exclamdown /logicalnot /radical /florin /approxequal /Delta /guillemotleft /guillemotright /ellipsis /space /Agrave /Atilde /Otilde /OE /oe /endash /emdash /quotedblleft /quotedblright /quoteleft /quoteright /divide /lozenge /ydieresis /Ydieresis /fraction /Euro /guilsinglleft /guilsinglright /fi /fl /daggerdbl /periodcentered /quotesinglbase /quotedblbase /perthousand /Acircumflex /Ecircumflex /Aacute /Edieresis /Egrave /Iacute /Icircumflex /Idieresis /Igrave /Oacute /Ocircumflex /apple /Ograve /Uacute /Ucircumflex /Ugrave 246 /circumflex /tilde /macron /breve /dotaccent /ring /cedilla /hungarumlaut /ogonek /caron ] >> endobj 86 0 obj 1212 endobj 87 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 720 /CapHeight 663 /Descent -270 /Flags 98 /FontBBox [ -182 -285 1150 851 ] /FontName /AIKNJK+AGaramond-Italic /ItalicAngle -18.5 /StemV 74 /XHeight 408 /CharSet (/zero/T/e/P/one/A/space/f/r/a/endash/h/s/g/three/i/t/S/G/eacute/j/I/u/d/\ five/k/comma/J/v/oacute/six/m/L/W/w/hyphen/l/n/M/x/period/y/H/b/o/B/N/z/\ c/p/O/C/quoteright) /FontFile 112 0 R >> endobj 88 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F10 /FirstChar 9 /LastChar 255 /Widths [ 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 206 380 500 500 863 770 208 320 320 400 560 250 320 250 250 500 500 500 500 510 500 500 500 500 500 250 250 560 560 560 300 770 596 581 646 739 566 533 703 761 341 340 623 546 874 739 730 552 730 574 471 634 734 622 878 576 564 601 320 340 320 560 500 360 444 466 338 474 346 261 382 475 278 259 448 246 729 501 406 448 465 341 262 284 496 426 657 420 366 406 320 260 320 560 250 596 596 646 566 739 730 734 444 444 444 444 444 444 338 346 346 346 346 278 278 278 278 501 406 406 406 406 406 496 496 496 496 467 400 500 500 460 390 500 465 825 825 1075 360 360 0 842 730 0 560 0 0 500 496 0 0 0 0 0 364 328 0 478 406 300 206 560 0 500 0 0 400 400 1000 250 596 596 730 979 578 500 1000 380 380 208 208 560 0 366 564 100 0 260 260 503 489 470 250 208 380 1176 596 566 596 566 566 341 341 341 341 730 730 0 730 734 734 734 278 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 ] /Encoding 85 0 R /BaseFont /AIKNJK+AGaramond-Italic /FontDescriptor 87 0 R >> endobj 89 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 86 0 R >> stream knowledge of external and internal world discourse model, etc. Also, models must allow for forward planning mechanisms, a buffer, and a monitoring mechanism. 0000020100 00000 n

Moda Center Water Bottle Policy, Gilgamesh Reincarnation Fanfiction, Articles L